• Protecting Water and Farmland in Simcoe County

Purest water: Tiny considers options including appeal, purchase, expropriation in wake of Teedon Pit PTTW

By
In AWARE News Network
Jan 27th, 2021
2 Comments
337 Views
Tiny Township Council in special meeting January 26 2021

Tiny Township Council in special meeting January 26 2021

By Kate Harries AWARE News Network

Tiny Township Council will go into closed session this afternoon, to consider its options following the provincial government decision to grant a 10-year permit to take water to CRH Canada for its Waverley Uplands Teedon Pit operation.

Several residents and organizations appeared before council yesterday, in a special meeting called on the matter, urging protection of what tests have determined is the cleanest water on record.

Councillors expressed annoyance that they had not been notified of the January 14 2021 decision, posted on the Environmental Registry of Ontario January 15, and had to learn about it from residents’ organizations who keep an eye on what is announced there.

This is particularly galling because the government has set a tight 15-day deadline for an appeal and the filing requirements are stringent, the township’s lawyer Sarah Hahn of the firm Barriston Law told council, noting that the deadline is in effect Friday, January 29 2021 – three days away from yesterday’s meeting.

In its notice asking for a judicial review hearing to be granted, the township will have to lay out what portion of the permit it is appealing and what its ground are. “It needs to be specific,” Hahn said, “it’s not something that can be done at a later stage. cards on the table.”

Clearly, the government is doing everything it can to discourage an appeal, said Councillor Tony Mintoff.

Along with other members of council, he expressed disappointment that the decision gave no regard to the two principles expressed by the township in its comments to the province – that Tiny does not want aggregate washing in an environmentally sensitive area, and it asked for no further licenses to be granted until a study of the water is completed by eminent hydrogeologist Dr. John Cherry.

“in my opinion we need to appeal every single step in the process,” Mintoff said, noting “the overwhelming resistance from our residents.”

“I have no confidence that the provincial ministries have the ability or even desire to monitor operations such as these,” he added. “I’m tired of hearing that these ministries are understaffed, or under-resourced and that they don’t have the wherewithal to operate effectively. They cannot be in my opinion trusted to protect our most valuable resources.”

He was referring to the ministry of environment, conservation and parks, which is responsible for monitoring any impact to groundwater, and the ministry of natural resources and forestry, which oversees aggregate operations.

Mintoff said this is a situation where “CRH gets all of the rewards and the township, its residents, the broader public in North Simcoe are assuming all the risk. If their experts are wrong, what are the consequences and who lives with them? I don’t think it’s going to be CRH.”

Mintoff suggested the township could offer CRH a fair market price to purchase the land and consider its use for affordable housing. If the company declines, the township should look at the feasibility of expropriating the property, he said.

Deputy Mayor Steffen Walma said he might be in favour of the idea of purchasing the land. “That’s an actual avenue where we can actually effect change,” he said. “What I don’t want to do is get into a legal battle… where we spend a whole bunch of money for nothing.”

Walma said he does not believe the township has grounds to appeal.

He noted that CRH has worked hard to address the concerns raised by the township’s consultants and he wants to maintain a good working relationship with the company. “i’m about winning the battle in the sense of protecting the water,” he said. “Purchasing, I like that. But the appeal, I’m out.”

Planning director Shawn Persaud told council that, based on the opinion provided by the township’s consultant Dave Hopkins of R.J. Burnside & Associates, he does not recommend an appeal.

Earlier, council heard deputations from residents Bonnie Pauze, Jake Pigeon and Peter Anderson, as well as from Kate Harries of AWARE Simcoe, Erik Schomann of the Green Party  of Ontario, Karen Rathwell of Wellington Water Watchers and Sandy Agnew of the Simcoe County Greenbelt Coalition. The clerk read out submissions from other residents, including John Nahuis and David Barkey, as well as from Mike Calzavara of the Council of Canadians.

To watch the special meeting, go to the township’s YouTube channel. The meeting starts with the deputations. Consultant Hopkins provides his perspective and fields questions from councillors at 48:00 to 1:20 and is followed by lawyer Hahn’s comments.

AWARE Simcoe Teedon PTTW Tiny

Council of Canadians Tiny Township

See also

‘We need to stop playing by the rules,’ says Tiny councillor

 

2 Responses to “Purest water: Tiny considers options including appeal, purchase, expropriation in wake of Teedon Pit PTTW”

  1. Michael Douglas says:

    Thank you AWARE Simcoe and everyone who spoke at the Tiny Township council meeting on Tuesday, January 26th. Protecting our most precious water resources takes time and effort, and in the case of the Tiny Township council decision there is a need for the Tiny Township representatives to demonstrate the foresight and sense of responsibility to properly represent the best interests of their constituents. Water is a human right that must not be misused in short sighted corporate money making schemes and especially should not be used to wash gravel.

  2. Marika paquin says:

    Is there another meeting today?? Jan 27? What time. where?

Leave a Reply

Commenters must post under real names. AWARE Simcoe reserves the right to edit or not publish comments. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *