• Protecting Water and Farmland in Simcoe County

New county waste contract trashed by local politicians

In Adjala-Tosorontio
Jul 10th, 2020
Packet & Times photo

Initial estimates from the County of Simcoe indicate the new contract will cost taxpayers nearly double the previous contract

By Jessica Owen Barrie Today July 2

Initial estimates from the County of Simcoe indicate the new contract will cost taxpayers nearly double the previous contract
Editor’s note: As a separated city, Barrie residents are not affected by County of Simcoe decisions regarding waste collection.

More details are coming to light about the 2021 waste collection contract that was announced last week by the County of Simcoe as a done deal.

However, some county councillors are pointing to the awarding of the contract as an example of what they say is a “problem” at the County of Simcoe, where councillors aren’t always being given all the information they would like to make informed decisions.

“This will never happen again. The county needs to change, big-time,” Bradford West Gwillimbury Deputy Mayor James Leduc told BarrieToday. “This is the really upsetting part. They told us we were going to award a multi-million-dollar contract to somebody, but we can’t know the name of it? If we can’t know the name of it, who should?

“We are the elected people who stand up for the residents of this county and it’s ridiculous for staff to think they can’t tell us the details. That tells me we have a problem up there at the county, and we need to change that,” he said.

On June 23, county councillors were given a staff report for information revealing some details of the 2021 waste collection contract. The contract was awarded to Miller Waste Systems for automated cart collection, to commence in November 2021.

The bids were presented to council in a closed session on April 14 and anonymously so council didn’t know which companies submitted the bids. Council ranked them in closed session, but voted in a public session to award the contract to the highest ranked bidder.

Councillors were not told they had chosen bids for the same company for both the East and West until they saw the report last week and the deal had already been finalized.

Leduc says the contract discussions shouldn’t have happened in closed session back in April.

“I hope the other county councillors can reflect on this, because it’s ridiculous how we do business up there. It needs to be a much more open process,” he said.

On Tuesday, the County of Simcoe provided some overall costing numbers for the 2021 waste contract.

In 2022, the county is estimating waste collection under the new contract with Miller Waste will ring in at approximately $49,450,247, servicing 157,917 homes county-wide.

For comparison, if the current waste contract with Waste Connections would have continued, the county estimates it would have cost $26,100,893 by 2022 for that same year.

To break the cost down for the average taxpayer, Rob McCullough, director of solid waste management, says the county’s current contract for manual collection with Waste Connections costs about $165 per year per serviced home.

The new 2021 collection costs with Miller Waste including the automated cart collection will be $315 per year per serviced home.

“The $315 per year… includes estimated costs for carts, collection service, garbage export/disposal costs, recycling and organics transfer and processing costs, and all administrative costs associated with collections,” said McCullough. “This accounts for the full service cost, not just the curbside pickup.”

Ramara Mayor Basil Clarke says he would have also liked to see more information on the overall costs, but there are other factors that can and will affect the cost.

“Part of this was, we were going to (pay) to build sorting stations, but now we don’t have to, so the cost has changed a few times since we’ve gone down this road,” he said. “Some of us were struggling with the true cost of this right from Day 1.”

The new contract with Miller Waste Systems is for seven years starting November 2021, with an option for two additional years.

McCullough said there are still some factors at play that will determine the final cost to residents.

“The new system costs are estimates only at this point since the county is in the process of letting a request for proposals for the provision of the carts and for the purposes of this estimate it has been assumed that the carts will be capitalized over a 10-year term,” said McCullough. “Also included in the new collection estimate is the cost for new bins (due to growth) and repairs to existing bins.”

Last summer, the current contractor, Waste Connections, cited labour shortages and extreme heat for significant collection delays felt county-wide. Since then, the topic has come up often at the council table with staff and councillors working to develop solutions.

“Many people are relieved to see we’re getting a new contract after the troubles we had with the old one,” Clarke told BarrieToday. “There are some concerns in my municipality over the larger containers. When you’re in a rural municipality and you have to drag these things down your driveway, I don’t see how it’s going to be feasible and that’s been my concern all along.”

Clarke said he did raise the issue at council meetings in the past, and other councillors had similar concerns. He also said he voted against the chosen contract.

“I’ve always had an issue with only having one contractor for an area as large as Simcoe County,” said Clarke. “When that one contractor fails, like the trouble we had last summer, what is our fallback solution?”

At past meetings, Clarke requested that the county be split into multiple zones for the contract with different companies responsible for each zone. To read previous coverage on this, click here.

“We approved these contracts without knowing the name,” said Clarke. “I have no trouble with that… but I would have again tried to urge councillors to split the county up into smaller sections. I would have liked to see some small modifications to how it was done.”

“This was a council decision, not a staff decision,” he added.

Leduc also had concerns about the contract, which he says led to him also voting against it.

“I wasn’t 100 per cent in support of it, let’s put it that way,” said Leduc. “It’s a huge cost to change our new contract from the old one.”

Leduc agrees with Clarke concerning having one contractor for the entire county. He also has concerns about the size of the bins for automated cart collection.

“It’s gone through, so I will support the system now, but in the beginning, I didn’t support the automated system, because where are people going to put those three big bins?” said Leduc. “It was something we wanted to talk about a little further.”

“When the big bins come in and people start to see the change, that’s when the complaints are going to come in,” he added.

* According to the County of Simcoe, all provided figures have been increased to 2022 estimates by reasonable consumer price index and growth factors to allow reasonable comparison between figures then are rounded to nearest $5 increment.

4 Responses to “New county waste contract trashed by local politicians”

  1. Robert C says:

    Since the County took over garbage collection from the townships several years ago (I don’t recall exactly when) the costs have skyrocketed and levels of service has declined. Now County staff are going to double the costs and force expensive and oh so unnecessary wheeled garbage cans onto residents. This will require specialized equipment that clearly adds to costs. When the new contractor defaults as did the current one there will once again no alternative to fall back on.

    Did the County even ask taxpayers if they wanted to move to these so-called garbage carts? Clearly not. So if nobody wanted them and it means doubling costs while giving a single contractor a stranglehold on the entire county why doesn’t council just quash the foolhardy plan and send out of touch staff back to the drawing board to try to come up with something more acceptable and cost effective.

    This whole business has been undemocratic and far from transparent. Unelected staff wouldn’t even trust our duly elected officials with the names of participating bidders. Who knows if there were alternatives considered hidden behind a veil of secrecy as they were.

    I demand this wasteful, unnecessarily high tech contract be scrapped in favour of small, low tech contracts awarded to trusted local providers.

  2. Ann says:

    I agree with Robert, the county should have held public meetings to inform and get feedback on this from the residents.

  3. Steven Kaasgaard says:

    Sorting was the fork in the road we should have taken in the early eighties! Now we really have to start all over again right from that point unless we want to repeat the ORIGINAL ERROR of making all of the poor public minions do the separating while sadly still costing us way too much to pay more and more middlemen to get out of the way of handling and sorting all of those valuable resources homeowners already sorted. That’s a lot of sorting for a simple program which required just one sorting. All this extra procedure before those resources can be returned to their proper reusable stream is too expensive for a “progressive society” like ours?. But really if you deconstruct this game, we have not progressed at all from the eighties and instead have to remain on that wheel of evolution till we actually understand hiding them in landfill sites will only leave it for future mining programs since we live on a planet with finite resources. All of those resources will one day have to be carefully mined back into play. And hey, won’t that be FUN!

    Back in the eighties when local greens were working to close the Perkinsfield Landfill site which had been used to illegally dump millions of litres of various toxic chemicals , we looked hard at alternatives to dumping valuable reusable resources into landfill sites and the most likely and easy way to do that was CLEARLY by sorting. It took ignorance and nonparticipating household completely out of the picture since everything would go through the same procedure of sorting. The State of Washington was one of the first to engage in this process which did not require homeowners to separate waste from recyclable items. As usual the bean counters and the for-profit entrepreneurs got involved and stole the entire idea out from under us and public participation and Voila! Here we are looking back at the multiplier effect of our original error STILL NOT realizing the only solution to this expensive arbitrary process is SORTING!

    Steven Kaasgaard

  4. Deb Rouleau says:

    I get it. Gigantic bins, unwieldy, difficult to conveniently store, and pretty much guaranteed to be kept outside in close proximity to my home. Yes, this will work. I have taken a slow drive around town (Tottenham) and taken a look at these unsightly additions to the community. I am already picturing trekking outside through a foot of snow, cleaning the snow and ice off the lid and depositing my bag of garbage inside. Then making sure I have shoveled a space large enough and within eight feet of the road. Fingers crossed that the snowplow doesn’t bury or obstruct the garbage before the garbage robot truck arrives. I can hardly wait. And of course I will be paying extra taxes for the added inconvenience. At least I’m not an eighty year old senior citizen living in Green Brier with a garage that is big enough to hold garbage bins OR my car, but not both. But hey, progress! And, oh yeah, they have wheels! Come on, this is just crazy.

Leave a Reply to Steven Kaasgaard Cancel reply

Commenters must post under real names. AWARE Simcoe reserves the right to edit or not publish comments. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *