• Protecting Water and Farmland in Simcoe County

Groundwater at risk: Groups slam Ford’s pro-aggregate agenda

By
In AWARE News Network
Nov 12th, 2019
6 Comments
493 Views
Water

Ontario Government bows to the aggregate industry, moves to block municipal efforts to protect groundwater

News release from Environmental Defence, Ontario Nature, Wellington Waterwatchers and Gravel Watch Ontario

Groups say the Ontario Government is putting the aggregate industry ahead of people. The province needs to go back to the drawing table, and consult with communities and environmental groups, rather than give industry free rein

With the introduction of Bill 132, the Ontario Government is rolling a boulder in front of municipal efforts to control groundwater impacts from aggregate pits and quarries and taking aggregates policy in the wrong direction.

Proposed changes to the Aggregate Resources Act (ARA) will prevent municipalities from addressing the impacts of pits and quarries on groundwater by outlawing the use of municipal zoning bylaws to prevent aggregate operations from digging beneath the water table. This change poses a dangerous threat to local groundwater supplies and quality.

The provincial government is also proposing to stop municipalities from implementing zoning restrictions on aggregate development on Crown Land within their boundaries. This change impacts many communities across Ontario.

Meanwhile, the government’s proposed amendments would make it easier for aggregate operators to make changes to their operations with a poorly defined “permit by rule” system that allows changes for unspecified “low risk” activities. It would also prevent consideration of road damage from haulage in deciding on license approvals.

The government needs to remove schedule 16 from Bill 132 and consult with communities that live near aggregate producing areas and environmental groups before proceeding with any changes to the Aggregates Resources Act. Aggregate producers cannot be allowed destroy Ontario’s natural heritage, disrupt communities, or endanger municipalities’ ability to protect the fresh water their citizens depend on.

The changes to the Aggregate Resources Act are only one of the many environmentally-damaging elements of Bill 132. Upcoming media releases from environmental groups will outline other harmful impacts of this bill.

QUOTES

“Stripping away the ability of municipalities to protect local groundwater supplies so we can build more roads and subdivisions with virgin materials is a recipe for conflict and environmental damage. The government has proposed these changes after consulting almost exclusively with the aggregates industry. It’s unacceptable. Ontario is not for sale,” says Keith Brooks, Programs Director of Environmental Defence. “The government needs to press pause on this, and go back to the drawing table.”

“When you combine these changes with the changes proposed for the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), you have a recipe for disaster. The PPS changes would permit aggregates extraction in all significant natural features outside the Greenbelt that are currently protected under the PPS, including provincially significant wetlands outside of southern Ontario, provincially significant woodlands, valley lands, wildlife habitat, significant Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest, fish habitat and the habitat of threatened and endangered species,” says Caroline Schultz, Executive Director of Ontario Nature.

“The proposed changes to the Act that will allow more pits to open with fewer constraints are coming on far too quickly, without the necessary public input or ability for oversight from municipalities. Wellington Water Watchers is calling for a pause on any new changes to the ARA and for a moratorium on any new permits to take water for quarrying operations until cumulative impacts can be assessed and until there is a requirement for a full Environmental Assessment on each proposed new quarry,” says Arlene Slocombe, Executive Director of Wellington Water Watchers.

“This is a proposal in search of a problem. There is no shortage of aggregates in Ontario, and too few options available to communities that take issue with these operations. And now the government wants to make it even harder for citizens and municipal government to protect their communities. The government needs to stop digging a deeper hole in our environmental protection rules and rethink its approach to aggregates,” says Graham Flint, President of Gravel Watch Ontario.

See also:

Partial to aggregate: the Ford government’s troubling approach

6 Responses to “Groundwater at risk: Groups slam Ford’s pro-aggregate agenda”

  1. Donna Deneault says:

    As quoted above: “There is no shortage of aggregates in Ontario.”

    This is just a complete disregard for something so vitally important as our beautiful Ontario groundwater. It is a disregard for the wishes of Ontario citizens. We are not asking for something outrageous here; just the protection of our critically important resources!

    “A recipe for disaster.”

    I feel like bombarding the government with emails. It would be great if we could stage a huge walk, like those that were done for Climate Change.

    Thank you AWARE-Simcoe for writing about this.

    • Cindy Mitchell says:

      Perhaps a march in Toronto at Ford’s office is needed. There are a variety of groups across Ontario that are challenged with similar concerns – a joint march could be the beginning of a joint effort for change

    • Josef van Ruyven says:

      Is the Ontario Government acting as a player in the world wide effort to control people by making us all dependent on governments for potable/drinking water by allowing the contamination of our free water supplies which are available to from groundwater aquifers?

  2. Joan lajeunesse says:

    Can’t you solicit the help of the media? CBC, globe & mail? These are national spokes-entities!

  3. Cindy Mitchell says:

    We need to make the public more aware of the great risks that the Aggregate industry can place upon our groundwater/aquifers. The media definitely needs to be involved so the messages to protect our water can be heard louder and further. I agree that we need more public input to protect our water sources. Ford’s government is making rapid changes with little public input and little input from experts ( scientists, environmental assessments etc); somehow, we must stop Ford’s government from stripping away our environmental protections. Clean water should be a human right and protected for the future. Down in Niagara, we have a huge fight to protect our aquifer (see: Niagara Water Protection Alliance on website and Facebook).

  4. Carol Kurtin says:

    I am very concerned about the proposed pit on hwy 45 in between Sebright and hwy 169. This area is wetlands and a large turtle population is in jeopardy. I travel this road every week and l have stopped to help several turtles cross the hwy. Last year l saw several turtles run over by vehicles and die. More traffic would add to their demise. With the environmental value of sphagnum, holding water and releasing it when its dry, this area is essential wetlands.

Leave a Reply

Commenters must post under real names. AWARE Simcoe reserves the right to edit or not publish comments. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *